Categories
Blog

What to Expect at the 2024 QM Connect Conference

Few industries are as fast-paced as higher education. The industry is constantly changing, whether due to new technologies, student enrollment trends, or funding priority updates. Staying connected with other educators and aware of broader industry trends is critical for faculty member success.  Understanding emerging tech and trends helps you identify threats and opportunities and can help your institution adjust pedagogically and methodologically. 

That’s why conferences and other events are so critical for educators. These events allow some of the brightest minds in their fields to connect, review, and discuss the significant changes in their field. 

The 2024 QM Connect conference will be in Chicago this November 3-6 and is poised to be one such event. This event boasts an all-star cast of speakers, informative lectures, and helpful workshops, all with the expressed intention of preparing the online education community for the future of virtual education. Read on to learn about what you can expect from the 2024 QM Connect conference and why we are so excited to attend. 

QM 2024 Schedule

Pre-Conference Workshop Options

The 2024 QM Connect conference will feature several informative workshops for your edification. Key focus areas include evangelizing quality assurance methodologies to the broader campus community, implementing and executing a quality assurance review, tying quality assurance efforts to accreditation, and determining how AI can increase your productivity. More detailed rubrics and agendas for workshops can be found here. 

The World of AI  

Generative AI looks to be the latest and greatest emerging technology of the 21st century. No industry will go unscathed by the AI Revolution, but digitally-driven verticals such as online education face unique challenges. Generative AI threatens to upend traditional quality assurance and plagiarism-prevention practices.  Institutions of higher education cannot merely ignore artificial intelligence. Students and their future employers won’t ignore AI, and institutions of higher education that don’t incorporate AI education and AI quality assurance into their coursework are doing their students a disservice. 

The 2024 QM Connect conference will feature several AI lightning talks, including the following:

  • Lightning Talks Part 1: 8:45 AM CT
  • Lightning Talks Part 2: 9:40 AM CT
  • Design Smarter, Not Harder: The AI Advantage
  • Employing AI to Create Just-In-Time Feedback that Supports Learner Success
  • Rapid, Quality Course Development: AI, Faculty Flexibility, and QM Synergy
  • The AI Authoring Advantage: Balancing Speed and Substance in Course Creation
  • The AI Empowered Instructional Designer
  • Using AI to Generate Engaging Course Content

Frequently Asked Questions

Key frequently asked questions are summarized below for your review. However, we recommend reviewing the complete list of FAQs here. 

Who Should Attend?

QM 2024 is open to all who are dedicated to quality assurance in education, whether as faculty, instructional support, administrators, or institutional higher-ups. 

How Do I Get Approval? 

The main benefits of attending the 2024 QM Connect lie in the tools and strategies you’ll receive from the event. The information you obtain from this conference will be extremely valuable for your organization, and you should return to your organization with proven tools and strategies to implement immediately. You’ll also connect with other educators and professionals in the space, giving your organization a broad list of contacts for future problem-solving and institutional problems.

We have found that specificity and passion are two crucial elements of the approval process, so be sure to incorporate these into your submissions to your institution. Please see a sample email linked. 

What Is the Newcomer’s Breakfast? 

The Newcomer’s breakfast is a chance for the conference to welcome all newcomers and give them the layout of what they can expect while at the conference. There is no fee for this event, but registration is required for all newcomers. 

Where Should I Stay When Attending the Conference? 

A block of rooms is reserved for attendees at the Loew’s Chicago O’Hare Hotel in Rosemont, IL. Availability is limited, so please reserve as soon as possible. 

Find Instructional Connections at the 2024 QM Connect Conference

Instructional Connections will have several speakers and attendees in Chicago this November 3-6, and we would love to connect with you if you are attending! The Sunday, November 3 reception is a great time to connect with the Instructional Connections team and learn more about how our Academic Coaches augment your institutional quality assurance initiatives. If this conference is not in the cards for you this year, stay tuned! More information about the 2025 QM Connect is expected to be announced in January.

Categories
Blog

Changes in How Students Are Learning

If you’ve been paying attention to the higher education industry, you’ve probably seen many changes over the years. However, few eras of student learning will involve such dynamic change as the past few years. Higher education has radically transformed over the last few years, and it doesn’t look to show any signs of slowing down. Due to the vast changes in the way students are learning, savvy higher education professionals would do well to pay close attention and adjust their modes of teaching.


To help you stay abreast of these changes, the team here at Instructional Connections assembled their thoughts on some of the most critical ways education is changing and how proper utilization of resources is pivotal for success. 

Stage or Side Instruction? 


Before we dive in, it’s important to take a closer look at two competing paradigms of educational philosophy.


The first is the “sage on a stage” model. In this model, the educator’s primary purpose is to be a subject matter expert, and educators ought to work to use that expertise to impart knowledge to their pupils.


In the “guide on the side model,” self-learning is the name of the game. In this paradigm, educators are mainly guides who help students engage with relevant content through projects, applied training, and classroom discussion.


There is utility to each of these philosophical models, but higher education professionals need to appreciate just how their roles in both paradigms have shifted over the last few years. Educators who have historically relied on their expertise within a given area may now find themselves having to diversify their curriculum. Likewise, guides may find that relevant expertise in defined content areas might help guide students through confusing or contradictory self-learning. 


The “guide on the side model” is also a much more common model for distance learning, merely due to the nature of the model. Most distance courses rely on students to be self-directed and capable of engaging with content critically. Most curriculums expect faculty to help students engage with and think critically about content and projects, not distill and spoon-feed all education to their pupils.

However, many faculty members find themselves thrown into the deep end when teaching remotely. 


If faculty members do find themselves migrating to virtual instruction and struggling with the transition from a sage on a stage to a guide on the side, it’s imperative that their institutions find ways to support them. 

The Rise of Non-Traditional Students


In that same vein, the rise of non-traditional students is another significant change in how students learn. These students are typically older, have some experience in the workforce, and have different schedules. They are thus quite different from the average college student, who is usually full-time and has more time to attend in-person classes. Non-traditional students also are much likelier to attend virtual classes since this type of education meshes well with their busy schedules. 


Non-traditional students, since they tend to be older and more experienced, are often much better at regulating their schedules and coursework. However, their dependence on virtual learning does pose challenges. Faculty instructors not used to virtual learning might struggle to adapt to this sort of teaching. 

Early Exposure to Professional Communities 


At one point, education was perceived as all a student needed to succeed. This was never entirely true, but it is becoming increasingly necessary to realize that a degree in and of itself is not a golden ticket. Students now are encouraged to begin networking early and connect with professionals in their vocation while still in school. Faculty instructors now realize that their role is not just to be a sage on a stage or a guide on the side. They also need to help students explore the ins and outs of their craft and make lasting connections to their vocational community. Work experience and familiarity with a vocation are huge boons now for faculty instructors looking to help their pupils network early. 

Academic Coaches & Changes in Learning 


Student learning will always continue to evolve. That’s just a fact. It’s imperative now that faculty instructors are prepared to showcase their expertise, guide through distance learning, and support non-traditional students. 


An Instructional Connection Academic Coach can be a great way to support faculty members through these challenges and maximize the potential of the faculty member. 


Our Academic Coaches all have at least a Master’s Degree and are experts in their field.  Their expertise and familiarity with their craft also make them an excellent resource for the students in their courses, who often see their Academic Coach as a peer and trusted mentor. This expertise in the subject matter lets our Academic Coaches free up time for faculty members to focus on what they do best: teaching! 
Our process is simple. 

  • Understanding Your Needs: Every course, every university, every faculty member is different. We begin by sitting down and understanding what you need in an academic coach. It is essential that we understand your unique needs before diving into the next steps in the process. 
  • Assigning the Right Academic Coach: Next, we assign you an Academic Coach. This Academic Coach will be contracted, paid, and managed by Instructional Connections. This eliminates the need for additional human resource workers or additional lifts on the part of the institution. 
  • Support Throughout the Semester: We will be in the wings the whole semester to ensure that your Academic Coach is properly supported and meeting your needs. 

The classroom is ever-evolving. Help your faculty members stay up-to-date and prepared for these changes with an Academic Coach from Instructional Connections. 

Contact Instructional Connections To Learn More!

Categories
Blog

Effective Practices In Using Academic Coaches: A Research Summary

Maximizing faculty is always a difficult task for any university, The research shows, time and time again, that student outcomes are better when their instructors have more time to focus on the subject matter over administrative tasks. As digital learning tools become more common, instructors find themselves needing support to facilitate successful distance learning. To help support their faculty and improve student outcomes for online learning courses, many institutions of higher education turn to Academic Coaches to help their faculty members shine. 

However, while the use of Academic Coaches is critical to successful instructional courses, little research has been conducted into how Academic Coaches are used. Successful application of Academic Coaches has huge ramifications for faculty success, but few universities know what practices will help their faculty use Academic Coaches well.

To help with this goal, Instructional Connections funded original research by Tracia M Forman and Jessica M Sanchez into the best practices for Academic Coaches at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. These findings were later presented by the two aforementioned researchers at the Texas Distance Learning Association’s 2022 conference. The goal of this research was to understand the behavior, preferences, and opinions of faculty who utilize Academic Coaches, with the aim of developing best practice guidelines for the future use of Academic Coaches. 

About UTRGV

The University of Texas Rio Grande is one of the largest primarily Hispanic universities in the country. The University has campuses across the Rio Grande Valley of southernmost Texas, mostly in McAllen, Harlingen, and Edinburg. The institution is unique as 54% of its students are first-generation students, and over 90% are Hispanic. The University of Texas Rio Grande, like other institutions of higher learning, was trying to maximize its faculty’s impact via distance learning. This became the perfect backdrop for Sanchez and Forman’s research into what makes a great Academic Coach. 

What is an Academic Coach? 

An Academic Coach, in the context of this research, was a trusted resource for University of Texas Rio-Grande Valley faculty members, an additional layer of support for UTRGV instructors. All Academic Coaches were employed by Instructional Connections, and all were subject matter experts within their field of study. All Academic Coaches have, at minimum, a Master’s Degree, although oftentimes, Academic Coaches may have other postgraduate degrees. The main purpose of an Academic Coach is to assist at the course level and help support students through more administrative tasks, tasks that eat up instructor time. 

The sample size that  Forman and Sanchez used to glean more insight into best practices around Academic Coaching consisted of 14 female instructors and 2 male instructors. A variety of disciplines were represented, with liberal arts being the most common. 

The main vehicle for this research was interviewing faculty about their experiences with Academic Coaches. That interview script can be accessed here. 

Forman and Sanchez investigated how Academic Coaches were being utilized at UTRGV to ensure that all Academic Coaches were being utilized in similar ways across the college. Typical responsibilities of Academic Coaches, according to the consulted faculty members, usually included grading, leading discussions, and answering student questions, although this varied from instructor of record to instructor of record. Most faculty members found few student complaints about their Academic Coach, and when student complaints did arise, grading was the main area of concern. 

The most common way of aligning with Academic Coaches was to hold a pre-course meeting to review standard operation procedures, expectations, and the types of assignments. Shadow sessions around grading were also scheduled by some faculty with their Academic Coaches to align on how grading ought to be conducted. 

Findings 

The research concluded that several Academic Coach strategies stood out as more effective. Those included…

  • Constant Communication
  • Clear Grading Rubrics
  • Detailed & Comprehensive Agendas

Forman and Sanchez also recommended several strategies for using Academic Coaches be discontinued. These included….

  • Offtopic Virtual  Meetings
  • Use of Unfamiliar Digital Learning Tools in the Classroom
  • Not Aligning on Grading Expectations Early

It is important to note that the UTRGV faculty members were, all in all, quite happy with their Instructional Connections Academic Coaches, aka Virtual TA. Their feedback did, however, note when Academic Coach utilization needed improvement, and the three aforementioned topics were the most common strategies Forman and Sanchez recommended be discontinued. 

From this research and discussion with the sample size, Forman and Sanchez were able to create a list of advice for instructors to maximize their use of Academic Coaches.

  • Clear Ground Rules & Expectations at Onset
  • Regular Cadences for Communication
  • Detailed Rubrics for Grading to Prevent Misalignment
  • Listen to Coach Ideas and Feedback to Improve Student Experiences  

Summary

This research found that clear expectations, communication, and meeting cadences all helped maximize the use of Academic Coaches at UTRGV. The issues that did arise were usually around grading, and the instructors interviewed found that clear rubrics could help alleviate these student complaints. 

Forman and Sanchez did find some areas of improvement for future research. Namely, incorporating direct feedback from Academic Coaches and developing a line of questions to further understand grading responsibilities were identified as areas of further research.

Instructional Connections would like to thank Forman and Sanchez for their tireless work and all UTRGV participants for their time and insight. The use of Academic Coaches and virtual TAs at institutions of higher learning is an understudied practice within the higher education community. This research helps all parties understand how to best support course instructors and improve distance learning.

The full research can be found here

For More Information, Contact Instructional Connections

Categories
Research

Effective Practices in Using Coaches in Large Online Courses

Tracia Forman and Jessica Sanchez, UTRGV

Presentation given at the Texas Digital Learning Annual Association Conference 2022, Galveston, TX

Increased online enrollment has results in the use of supplementary instructional support to enhance effective course delivery.  Use of an instructional team approach plays an invaluable role in student success.

UTRGV-TxDLA-Presentation-3.23.22[78]

Categories
Research

Academic Coaches And Student Success In Higher Education: A Quantitative Study.

Academic Coaches and Student Success in Higher Education.

Published in the Journal for Distance Education. May 31, 2023.

Nicole C. LetchworthSummer Koltonski & L. Kathleen Sheriff (2023) Academic Coaches and Student Success in Higher Education, American Journal of Distance Education, DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2023.2210491

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08923647.2023.2210491 

Categories
Research

What motivates an academic coach in an online accelerated course? Using a qualitative approach.

Here is a .pdf of the partial findings of this research that were presented at the North American Management Society virtual conference. The principle investigators are completing their research study and we will supply a full report in Q4 2021.

NAMS 2021 Presentation_Final

Categories
Research

The effect of online academic coaches on supporting graduate students’ performance in intensive online learning environments: a three-course comparison

Dr. Suyoung Park and her colleague Dr. Petra Robinson at Louisiana State University researched the performance levels of graduate students and the support that graduate students receive when they interact with academic coaches in intensive online courses.  They looked at students in three different online courses. Among their findings was the overarching ethos that academic coaches provide an effective framework for student support.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJTD-10-2020-0144/full/html?skipTracking=true#loginreload

Categories
Research

Determining roles and best practices when using academic coaches in online learning

The University of Louisiana at Lafayette recently had an article published in the Journal of Teaching and Learning in Nursing, entitled “Determining roles and best practices when using Academic Coaches in online learning.” The article acknowledges the continued growth of online learning and identifies the role that academic coaches maintain in an online learning environment, and highlights best practices when using academic coaches in an accelerated online course.

Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Official Journal of the Organization for Associate Degree Nursing.  Volume 15, Issue 4.  In progress (October 2020). This issue is in progress but contains articles that are final and fully citable.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1557308720300482?via%3Dihub

 

Categories
Reports

2020 CHLOE 4 Report: The Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE): Navigating the Mainstream

2020 CHLOE 4 Report: The Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE): Navigating the Mainstream

In its fourth year, the Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE) Survey — a survey of Chief Online Officers (COOs) produced by the partnership of QM and Eduventures Research, the research division of ACT | NRCCUA — continued to expand, with 367 U.S. colleges and universities responding, including public, private and for-profit institutions. That represents a 31% increase from CHLOE 3.

(https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/CHLOE-4-report-2020)

Categories
Blog

Instructional Connections Research Grant Submissions Are Open for 2020

Instructional Connections wants to give back to our partners and help create a better educational experience for all. Which is why we are pleased to announce our 2nd round of research grants totaling in at over $33,000 are open for submissions and will be awarded to 4 partner institutions in the coming quarter.

Our research grants will directly support scholarly & public discourse & foster the next generation of research around academic coaching, long distance learning, & the potential for new online degrees & courses.

Our research grant opportunities are for research around the efficacy of Academic Coaching Models in an accelerated course environment across a variety of disciplines. Our ultimate goal is to improve and advance the understanding of online learning and how academic coaching can continue to improve the learning experience for all students.

Instructional Connections expects the research grant proposals to include:

  • Strong research designs and stringent analytic methods
  • Clear and compelling reasoning for the significance of the research
  • Conceptual framework and past related research

These research grants reflect our high commitment to innovation in education and working to provide better and move inclusive options for all students, faculty, and institutions.

Instructional Connections Research Grant Application & Submission

There are 8 parts to our research grant application process, and each applicant is required to complete all parts of the application in order to be considered:

Section I:

Principal Investigator Contact Information: We request that you provide complete contact information of the principal investigator at the beginning of your application.

Section II:

Employment and Educational Credential Information: Include your institute, job title, and educational credentials in order to be considered for our research grant. Only partner institutions are eligible.

Section III:

CV Submission: Please provide your curriculum vitae, showing the course of your work throughout your professional life. This can range from 2-6 pages and should be detailed enough that its viewer can understand the direction and advancements of your career path.

Section IV:

Research Interests and Methodologies: Include a detailed section that summarizes your research accomplishments, current work, and future direction or potential for your work. Your future research interests may discuss specific issues or broad categories.

Section V:

Proposal Summary: Please provide a concise proposal summary in which you overview your research. Your research proposal summary can be similar to a research proposal abstract.

Section VI:


Proposed Budget Allocation: Indicate how you plan on spending your research grant, if you should receive it, allowing for categories and the amount of your budget that will be used in each.

Section VII:

Proposal Submission: Please submit your full proposal, explaining your purpose, methodology, timeline (preferred under 1-year), and other pertinent facts that will affect your research.

Section VIII:

Signature/Submit: Please sign your proposal and submit it by no later than May 30th, 2020.

Additional Resources:

Additional proposal submission instructions can be found on the IC Budget Policy and IC Grant FAQs pages.

Instructional Connections Research Grant Proposal Evaluation Criteria

  • Overall presentation of a concise, cohesive, and compelling project proposal
  • Research which will add to scholarly literature currently available on the topic
  • Detailed information on the method which will be employed to analyze the data
  • Presentation of the educational significance, the research questions, and the proposed activities (data collection and analyses)
  • Presentation of a budget and timeline for the project that fits within a 1-year timeline

Evaluations:

Each of the criteria will be given a point value from 1-20 points. A maximum point value of 100 points can be assigned for any given proposal.

A committee of academic peers and Instructional Connections officers will review each proposal. Each committee member will submit their individual scores, which will then be averaged.

Once the decision is made, Instructional Connections will contact the grant awardee. Award decisions are conveyed within six weeks of the award committee completion of the review process.

Once the grant is disbursed to the institution, your time frame for the research begins. If an extension of time is required for completion of the research, you will need to submit a request in writing to IC at least three months prior to the end of the original date of completion, with a full explanation for why the extension is required.

Current employees (full-time, part-time or independent contractors) of Instructional Connections are ineligible to apply for grants.

Contact Instructional Connections for More Information

Questions about the grant process can be directed to: Dr. Harriet Watkins, Chief Academic Officer at [email protected].

Or visit our website to learn more about Instructional Connections, our grants, and our online academic coaches.